As
I've told my wife too many times, the meaning of any poem hides in the
marriage of cadence and sound. Vowels on a carousel, consonants on a
calliope, whistles and bells, we need them all if a poem is to tickle
our ears. Otherwise, the lines are gristle and fat, no meat.
Is
it any wonder, then, my wife has had a problem, for decades now, with
any poem I've given her to read for a second opinion. This is especially
true when we both know the poem has no message and I simply want to
hear the music, assuming there is some. Miles Davis made a living doing
the same thing in jazz clubs. Why can't I have a little fun and give it a
try even if my instrument is words?
The
other night in bed I gave my wife my latest poem to read. I said it was
fetal, not final. Afterward she said that reading this poem was no
different than reading all the others I had given her over the
years. She had thought I'd improve by now. Maybe I should switch to
fiction or the essay, she suggested, or else stick with editing the
manuscripts of others since I had made a decent living as an editor for
many years.
"You've
been writing poetry for decades," she said, "but reading a poem like
this is like looking through a kaleidoscope while listening to a
harpsichord."
Point
well taken, I thought, point well said. The nuns for whom I toiled all
those years in grammar school would have liked my wife. They might have
even recruited her to join their order.
Then
I asked her what a man should do if he has careened for years through
the caves of his mind spelunking for the right line for a poem only to
hear his wife say that reading his poem was like "looking
through kaleidoscope while listening to a harpsichord."
Should
I quit writing? Start drinking? After all I quit drinking when
I started writing and I discovered that the hangovers from both were
equally debilitating.
The following morning she said, "You should never quit writing."
At
that moment, she was enthroned at the kitchen table, as regal as ever
in her fluttery gown and buttering her English muffin with long,
languorous strokes Van Gogh would envy.
"You
should write even more,” she said, “all day and all night, if need
be. After all, my line about the 'kaleidoscope and harpsichord' needs a
poem of its own. It's all meat, no gristle, no fat."
Author Bio:
Nominated for Best of the Net and Pushcart prizes, Donal Mahoney has had work published in a variety of print and electronic publications in North America, Europe, Asia and Africa.
No comments:
Post a Comment